Surface Water Management
Public Works
HYDRAULIC
TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Please
Note:
These files are in Adobe Acrobat .Pdf format. You need the Adobe Acrobat
Reader browser plug-in to view and/or print Acrobat Pdf files. You can download Adobe Acrobat here for free. |
SKAGIT
RIVER FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION FEASIBILITY STUDY HYDRAULICS TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION
Includes:
I. Background
A. General
B. Purpose of Documentation
C. Study Area
D. Skagit River BasinII. Hydraulic Analysis Methodology
A. Model Extent
B. Study Approach
C. Floods Studied
D. Description of Hydraulic Models1. UNET Model Development
a. Purpose of Model
b. Procedures and Process
c. Boundary Conditions
d. Basic Assumptions and Limitations2. FLO 2-D Model Development
a. Purpose of Model
b. Procedures and Process
c. Boundary Conditions
d. Basic Assumptions and Limitations3. Structures Affecting Flow
a. Levees
b. Bridges
c. Diversion/Impoundment Structures4. Levee Breach Methodology
III. Model Calibration
A. Sources of Data
B. UNET Calibration
C. FLO-2D CalibrationIV. UNET/FLO-2D Results and Output
A. Index Points
B. Flow/Stage/Frequency Relationships
C. Floodplain Delineations 15 D. Qualification of Base Condition ResultsV. The Use of Hydraulic Results for Developing Project Outputs
A. Risk-Based Analysis
B. Overview of RBA in Flood Management Studies
C. Flood Damage Reduction Analysis Model
D. Uncertainties Specific to the Skagit River Study
E. Expected Annual Damages
F. Expected Annual Exceedance Probability
G. Long-Term Risk
H. Conditional Probability of Non-Exceedance
I. FEMA Certification
References
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Skagit River Cross Section Comparison (1975-99) - Summary Table 4A
Table 2 FLO-2D Dynamic Wave Coefficients 7
Table 3 Modeled Bridges on the Skagit River 9
Table 4 Levee Failure Points in UNET 10A
Table 5 December 1975 Simulated vs. Observed High Water Marks 12B
Table 6 UNET Roughness Ranges 12
Table 7 November/December 1995 Simulated vs. Observed High Water Marks 13
Table 8 FLO-2D Floodplain Roughness Values 13
Table 9 Variation of Roughness Values for Rating Curves 14A
Table 10 Rating Curves with Uncertainty 14B
Table 11 5, 50, and 95% Flow Peaks at Each Index Point 14C
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 Damage Reaches - Skagit River Valley, WA 10B
Figure 2 December 1975 Simulated and Observed Hydrograph at Mount Vernon 12A
Figure 3 Observed Versus Simulated November/December 1995 Event at Mount Vernon 13A
PLATES
Plate 1 Study Area Map with Locations of FLO-2D Modeling, UNET Cross Sections, and Levees
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A Background Hydrology Reports
Appendix B Water Surface Profiles With Levee Failure Points and Varying Debris Loading Runs
Appendix C 10- to 500-year Floodplain Maps:10 Year Flood Map
25 Year Flood Map
50 Year Flood Map
75 Year Flood Map
100 Year Flood Map
250 Year Flood Map
500 Year Flood Map (50% Levee Failure)
500 Year Flood Map (Overtopping)